Current:Home > InvestFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Financium
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:30:49
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (431)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- When big tech laid off these H-1B workers, a countdown began
- Dua Lipa Fantastically Frees the Nipple at Barbie Premiere
- Save 40% On Top-Rated Mascaras From Tarte, Lancôme, It Cosmetics, Urban Decay, Too Faced, and More
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Traveling over the Fourth of July weekend? So is everyone else
- Ex-Starbucks manager awarded $25.6 million in case tied to arrests of 2 Black men
- In Pennsylvania, a New Administration Fuels Hopes for Tougher Rules on Energy, Environment
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Why Paul Wesley Gives a Hard Pass to a Vampire Diaries Reboot
Ranking
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Planet Money Live: Two Truths and a Lie
- Judge blocks a Florida law that would punish venues where kids can see drag shows
- Mazda, Toyota, Nissan, Tesla among 436,000 vehicles recalled. Check car recalls here.
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Nature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics
- CoCo Lee's Husband Bruce Rockowitz Speaks Out After Her Death at 48
- Watch Carlee Russell press conference's: Police give update on missing Alabama woman
Recommendation
Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
In Brazil, the World’s Largest Tropical Wetland Has Been Overwhelmed With Unprecedented Fires and Clouds of Propaganda
Shein invited influencers on an all-expenses-paid trip. Here's why people are livid
Lung Cancer in Nonsmokers? Study Identifies Air Pollution as a Trigger
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Who Were the Worst Climate Polluters in the US in 2021?
Community and Climate Risk in a New England Village
International Commission Votes to Allow Use of More Climate-Friendly Refrigerants in AC and Heat Pumps